More and more contracts seem to be moving toward clauses which require the parties to submit to arbitration rather than taking the matter to court. In the case linked below, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit examines the issue of whether or not an arbitration clause in an insurance contract forces the employee to arbitrate all claims or if some claims were excluded from this clause. In this case, Munro v. University of Southern California, the Court examined whether or not an arbitration clause bound employees to settle a dispute in arbitration that was not personal to the employee but rather a dispute brought on behalf of the ERISA plan itself.
As more and more companies move to arbitration clauses, these type of issues will arise. If you need help with your long-term disability claim, call us. We are here to help.
This is the link to the Munro case: https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/07/24/17-55550.pdf
Latest Posts
The New ERISA Regs. Are Coming Soon
Periodically, the regulations that govern ERISA are updated and modified. Below is a press release regarding updates from 2018. These changes in the law...
The New ERISA Regs. Are Coming Soon
Revisiting A Key First Circuit Decision
Below is a case that discusses the "safe harbor" exception to ERISA. Remember, if you need help filing or pursuing your long-term disability claim,...
Revisiting A Key First Circuit Decision
A Great Federal Register Article / New Regulations
Below is an article about new regulations that relate to ERISA claims. As with any area of the law, ERISA changes from time to time. If you have a problem...