In this 2023 ERISA case, the Court held that the trial court properly concluded that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate complete and continuous disability during the six months following her resignation under ERISA because ample evidence suggested that she could perform some work in some instances based on the report from her physical therapy sessions, which described her to moving well and suffering no pain, at the time. Also, her supervisor suggested that she could still perform some of her main duties as an accounts receivable manager. The lower court was affirmed.
If you need assistance navigating your claim for short term or long term disability benefits under ERISA, or it is time to sue the insurance company, please do not hesitate to give Cody Allison & Associates, PLLC a call (844) LTD-CODY, (615) 234-6000. or send us an e-mail Cody@codyallison.com. We provide representation nationwide and have successfully sued all the major insurance companies in many states. Our headquarters are located in Nashville, Tennessee. We offer a free consultation and would love to speak with you.
Latest Posts
by Cody AllisonThe Supreme Court Decision in Metropolitan Life v. Glenn
The case below examines the conflict of interest a plan administrator may have in the denial or payment of benefits under a long-term disability plan. If...
by Cody AllisonOakley v. Remy International, Inc.
In this 2010 Middle District of Tennessee Case, the only connection between Tennessee and the putative class action filed under the Labor Management...
by Cody AllisonExhaustion of Remedies
Below is an example of a provision in a long-term disability policy that can act as a "roadblock" to making a successful claim through the courts. In this...