- Smith v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. (4th Cir., 2024)
- Ruling: The court reversed a long-term disability (LTD) benefit denial, finding that Aetna had failed to conduct a full and fair review of the claim.
- Reasoning: The insurer failed to adequately address or discuss contradictory evidence, particularly a report from a Social Security Administration (SSA) doctor that supported the claimant’s disability.
- Significance: This ruling reinforced ERISA’s procedural requirements, emphasizing that plan administrators must comprehensively examine all relevant evidence and explain any disagreements with a claimant’s medical documentation.
- If you need assistance navigating your claim for short term or long-term disability benefits under ERISA, or it is time to sue the insurance company, please do not hesitate to give Cody Allison & Associates, PLLC a call (844) LTD-CODY, (615) 234-6000. or send us an e-mail Cody@codyallison.com. We provide representation nationwide and have successfully sued all the major insurance companies in many states. Our headquarters are located in Nashville, Tennessee. We offer a free consultation and would love to speak with you.
Latest Posts
Smith v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
Smith v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. (4th Cir., 2024) Ruling: The court reversed a long-term disability (LTD) benefit denial, finding that Aetna...
Smith v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
UncategorizedAugust 25, 2025
Scanlon v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.
From an article by Matthew Maloney for the American Bar Association: Just over one year ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh...
Scanlon v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.
UncategorizedJune 17, 2025
The Supreme Court Decision in Metropolitan Life v. Glenn
The case below examines the conflict of interest a plan administrator may have in the denial or payment of benefits under a long-term disability plan. If...