In an ERISA long term disability case, the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of a claimant was affirmed because, while the court adjudicated the parties’ summary judgment motions as if it were ruling in a bench trial, whether the district court’s decision survived de novo review of its legal determinations and clear error review of its factual findings turned on whether it clearly erred in finding the claimant lacked sedentary work capacity on the record before it, the appellate court could not say the district court’s finding that the claimant lacked sedentary work capacity was clearly erroneous, and it had to disregard as harmless the district court’s error in adjudicating the parties’ motions for summary judgment as if it were ruling in a bench trial.
If you need assistance navigating your claim for short term or long term disability benefits under ERISA, or it is time to sue the insurance company, please do not hesitate to give Cody Allison & Associates, PLLC a call (844) LTD-CODY, (615) 234-6000. or send us an e-mail Cody@codyallison.com. We provide representation nationwide and have successfully sued all the major insurance companies in many states. Our headquarters are located in Nashville, Tennessee. We offer a free consultation and would love to speak with you.
Latest Posts
Smith v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
Smith v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. (4th Cir., 2024) Ruling: The court reversed a long-term disability (LTD) benefit denial, finding that Aetna...
Smith v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
Scanlon v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.
From an article by Matthew Maloney for the American Bar Association: Just over one year ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh...
Scanlon v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.
The Supreme Court Decision in Metropolitan Life v. Glenn
The case below examines the conflict of interest a plan administrator may have in the denial or payment of benefits under a long-term disability plan. If...