In this 2021 ERISA case, the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of claimant was affirmed because, while the court adjudicated the parties’ summary judgment motions as if it were ruling in a bench trial, whether the district court’s decision survived de novo review of its legal determinations and clear-error review of its factual findings turned on whether it clearly erred in finding the claimant lacked sedentary-work capacity, on the record before it, the appellate court could not say the district court’s finding the claimant lacked sedentary-work capacity was clearly erroneous, and it had to disregard as harmless the district court’s error in adjudicating the parties’ motions for summary judgment as if it were ruling in a bench trial. The judgment of the lower court was affirmed.
If you need assistance navigating your claim for short term or long term disability benefits under ERISA, or it is time to sue the insurance company, please do not hesitate to give Cody Allison & Associates, PLLC a call (844) LTD-CODY, (615) 234-6000. or send us an e-mail Cody@codyallison.com. We provide representation nationwide and have successfully sued all the major insurance companies in many states. Our headquarters are located in Nashville, Tennessee. We offer a free consultation and would love to speak with you.
Latest Posts
Vanderbilt Employees / ERISA Long-Term Disability Information
If you live or work in Nashville or the surrounding area, chances are you may be employed by Vanderbilt, one of the largest employers in this area. Below...
RSD and CRPS Long-Term Disability Claims
When you are preparing to make a long-term disability claim, you may wonder what is covered under your policy. Of course, there are conventional illnesses...
RSD and CRPS Long-Term Disability Claims
Arbitration in ERISA Cases
More and more contracts seem to be moving toward clauses which require the parties to submit to arbitration rather than taking the matter to court. In the...