In this 2021 ERISA case, the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the claimant was affirmed because, while the court adjudicated the parties’ summary-judgment motions as if it were ruling in a bench trial, whether the district court’s decision survived de novo review of its legal determinations and clear-error review of its factual findings turned on whether it clearly erred in finding the claimant lacked sedentary work capacity, on the record before it, the appellate court could not say the district court’s finding the claimant lacked sedentary-work capacity was clearly erroneous, and it had to disregard as harmless the district court’s error in adjudicating the parties’ motions for summary judgment as if it were ruling in a bench trial. The judgment of the lower court was affirmed.
If you need assistance navigating your claim for short term or long term disability benefits under ERISA, or it is time to sue the insurance company, please do not hesitate to give Cody Allison & Associates, PLLC a call (844) LTD-CODY, (615) 234-6000. or send us an e-mail Cody@codyallison.com. We provide representation nationwide and have successfully sued all the major insurance companies in many states. Our headquarters are located in Nashville, Tennessee. We offer a free consultation and would love to speak with you.
Latest Posts
An Important Decision Regarding ERISA Review Standard
This case discusses the standard that the Court should apply in determining if the denial of benefits under a disability plan was wrongful. As you can...
GMA Looks Into ‘Hired Gun’ Insurance Doctors In ERISA Long-Term Disability Case
Below is an interesting story about Good Morning America investigating "hired gun" insurance doctors in a long-term disability case. These types of...
Some Inside Info. on UNUM
One of the areas where we can help you with your claim is that we have to deal with these insurers all the time. UNUM is one of these insurers. It is...