In this 2017 case, where an ERISA claims administrator terminated a recipient’s long-term disability benefits, substantial evidence supported the decision, including that treatment notes reflected continued improvement in her anxiety and depression, and nothing in the record demonstrated that the medications themselves prevented her from working. The administrator was not required to personally examine her because the plan did not require a personal examination, even if the disability was mental illness. The administrator was not judicially estopped from arguing the recipient was not disabled because that position was inconsistent with the position it took when it required her to apply for SSA benefits, paid for her SSA representation, and benefitted from her receiving those benefits, because the ERISA standard for disability benefits was different than that for SSA benefits.
Judgment affirmed.
If you need assistance navigating your claim for short term or long-term disability benefits under ERISA, or it is time to sue the insurance company, please do not hesitate to give Cody Allison & Associates, PLLC a call (844) LTD-CODY, (615) 234-6000. or send us an e-mail Cody@codyallison.com. We provide representation nationwide and have successfully sued all the major insurance companies in many states. Our headquarters are located in Nashville, Tennessee. We offer a free consultation and would love to speak with you.
Latest Posts
Discovery in ERISA Lawsuits
The case below addresses issues of discovery in ERISA lawsuits. "Discovery" is the legal term for the procedures that lawyers use to find out...
Discovery in ERISA Lawsuits
A Great ERISA Decision – Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
This court opinion once again examines what sort of decision is "arbitrary and capricious" when a plan adjuster denies a claim. In these type of claims,...
Strong ERISA LTD Opinion From The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
The case below discusses what evidence of disability a claimant must produce and what evidence an administrator must consider in denying a claim. Our law...